2021-02-08 23:05:16 | The Netanyahu Trial, Explained – The New York Times


Story by: Patrick Kingsley The New York Times World News

JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel pleaded not guilty on Monday in his trial on bribery, fraud and breach of trust charges, a case that has dominated Israel’s political life and sparked a debate about the state of Israeli democracy and the country’s legal system. It has also contributed to a split in Mr. Netanyahu’s own political party and could define the buildup to next month’s general election — Israel’s fourth in two years.

Here are details about the charges and their context.

The police investigations that led to Mr. Netanyahu’s trial began in 2016, and the police formally recommended he be prosecuted in February 2018. He was indicted in November 2019 and the trial itself began in May 2020 — but has since been delayed several times by coronavirus restrictions.

The trial combines three separate cases, known as Cases 1000, 2000 and 4000. Mr. Netanyahu has been cleared of involvement in a fourth case, Case 3000, which concerns the government’s procurement of German-made submarines.

The indictment accuses Mr. Netanyahu of accepting nearly $300,000 in gifts, including cigars and Champagne, from 2007 to 2016 from two businessmen: the Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan and the Australian billionaire James Packer.

In return, prosecutors say, the prime minister acted on Mr. Milchan’s behalf, including by pressuring the finance ministry to double the duration of a tax exemption for expatriate Israelis like Mr. Milchan after they return to the country from abroad.

See also  2020-11-06 10:09:36 | Georgia 2020 election results: why Democrats are optimistic

The indictment alleges that Mr. Netanyahu also lobbied the American government to help Mr. Milchan renew his American visa, and assisted with a merger deal involving a television channel owned in part by Mr. Milchan.

There is no accusation that Mr. Packer received anything in return for his gifts.

Like Mr. Netanyahu, Mr. Milchan and Mr. Packer deny wrongdoing, and the two men are not on trial. Mr. Netanyahu’s wife, Sara, is also said to have received gifts, but is not a defendant in the trial.

Mr. Netanyahu is alleged to have discussed a quid pro quo arrangement in 2014 with Arnon Mozes, the publisher of Yediot Aharonot, one of Israel’s leading newspapers.

Under the deal as described in the charges, Mr. Netanyahu was meant to receive supportive coverage from the paper. In exchange, Mr. Netanyahu is accused of agreeing to consider enacting legislation that would curb the strength of Israel Hayom, a rival newspaper that was owned by Sheldon Adelson, a supporter of Mr. Netanyahu. But Mr. Netanyahu is not accused of following through on that promise.

Mr. Mozes, also on trial, denies wrongdoing.

From 2012 to 2017, Shaul Elovitch, a telecom mogul, and his wife, Iris, are accused of granting favors to Mr. Netanyahu and his family in the hope that Mr. Netanyahu would not obstruct the Elovitches’ business interests.

In particular, Mr. Elovitch is alleged to have repeatedly allowed Mr. Netanyahu and his family to shape the coverage of his news website, Walla. In return, Mr. Elovitch hoped the prime minister would do nothing to disrupt his various business interests, including allowing the smooth passage of a complex merger between the telecom company he formerly owned, Bezeq, and his satellite television provider, Yes.

See also  2021-02-12 17:59:13 | Libby Squire murderer jailed for minimum of 27 years | UK news

The Elovitches are also on trial and deny wrongdoing.

Mr. Netanyahu is not legally obliged to step down. Though other government ministers must resign if charged, prime ministers can remain in office until they are convicted.

When one of Mr. Netanyahu’s predecessors, Ehud Olmert, was accused of corruption in 2008, Mr. Netanyahu helped prompt Mr. Olmert’s resignation, arguing that Mr. Olmert would be too distracted to do his job properly.

But a decade later, Mr. Netanyahu has refused to follow his own advice, becoming the first Israeli leader to face trial while still in office.

He says he will leave office only through the ballot box, arguing that the charges against him are trumped up, and fostered by unelected bureaucrats seeking to force him out of office against the will of the electorate.

If convicted, Mr. Netanyahu could be sentenced to several years in jail — but the judges will not reach a verdict for months, or even years. The trial has already been delayed several times by coronavirus restrictions, and even once the pandemic subsides, the court will not meet every day.

Judges are currently considering a request from Mr. Netanyahu’s lawyers to delay the hearing of prosecution witnesses until after the election.

Many analysts don’t expect the trial to significantly affect voting patterns in the election. The allegations against Mr. Netanyahu have been a part of public discourse for so long that many Israelis formed fixed opinions about them even before the trial began.

See also  2021-02-07 07:00:04 | American Kompromat review: Trump, Russia, Epstein … and a lot we just don't know | Donald Trump

The trial has nevertheless caused a split in Mr. Netanyahu’s party, Likud.

One of his former allies, Gideon Saar, has formed his own breakaway group, New Hope, and seeks to attract Likud voters who have grown uncomfortable with Mr. Netanyahu’s personal behavior. But Mr. Saar trails Mr. Netanyahu in the polls, and appears to be eating into the vote shares of other anti-Netanyahu parties, making it harder for Mr. Saar to form a governing coalition.

David Halbfinger and Gabby Sobelman contributed reporting.


Story continues…

Source References: The New York Times World News

Leave a Reply